Comments on: 8 SEO Reflexes for Web Developers http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed The Simple Solution Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:14:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ahmad Barirani http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-259 Ahmad Barirani Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:23:08 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-259 Thank you Chris for your precisions. Indeed, exaggerated use of h1, bold, etc. will lead to lower pagerank and content quality. After all, the point is to get people come back :) Thank you Chris for your precisions. Indeed, exaggerated use of h1, bold, etc. will lead to lower pagerank and content quality. After all, the point is to get people come back :)

]]> By: Chris Peterson http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-258 Chris Peterson Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:01:15 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-258 Ahmad Barirani, After going through your article, I can say that you have mentioned good point. But I am not agree in step 3, I mean we can use h1, h2, h3, bold or italic one time in a page, we can’t repeat, if we l repeat then it will be consider as spamming. Lastly I can say that unique content is most necessary. Ahmad Barirani,
After going through your article, I can say that you have mentioned good point. But I am not agree in step 3, I mean we can use h1, h2, h3, bold or italic one time in a page, we can’t repeat, if we l repeat then it will be consider as spamming.
Lastly I can say that unique content is most necessary.

]]> By: Ahmad Barirani http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-111 Ahmad Barirani Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:53:28 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-111 Thanks for your valuable comments shi. Thanks for your valuable comments shi.

]]> By: shi http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-31 shi Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:18:21 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-31 Mis Tigi yahoo seems to take them into account still. Mis Tigi

yahoo seems to take them into account still.

]]> By: shi http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-30 shi Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:13:41 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-30 well, i guess you're having some good points but also missing some: # Use h1, h2, h3, bold and italic around keywords as much as possible. forget about bold and italic tags please!!! we're in a semantic area of the web. perhaps you meant em ? # Don’t overuse Ajax. Since Ajax content is dynamic, some of the page’s content will not be seen by the spider. not true at all. if you use remote request in a non obstructive way, your website will be crawled very well. an other thing though, is that google spider (don't know for other search engine though) seems to interpret javascript and seems to be rather happy with it. do not mis-use javascript will be a closer to what you want to say. # Don’t use Flash for menus. The spider doesn’t look at Flash. wrong for non dynamic contents but indeed who will want to have its static menu within a swf with all the pain in the butt it includes when most of the time you can do some pretty neat things with javascript instead. # Use keywords in the anchor text also. Are anchors indexed? <blockquote cite="#comment-body-28"> <strong><a href="#comment-28" rel="nofollow">Mis Tigi</a> :</strong> yahoo seems to use it still. i have to say that yahoo spiders seems to way much more effective than the google one in many places. where google does emphasize the domain and url name, it does give you some rather dummy result. yahoo does take this too into account but seems to correlate with other factors . Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ? <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html</a> VA:F [1.6.6_911] <a title="5 / 5" rel="nofollow"></a><a title="4 / 5" rel="nofollow"></a><a title="3 / 5" rel="nofollow"></a><a title="2 / 5" rel="nofollow"></a><a title="1 / 5" rel="nofollow"></a> please wait... Rating: 0.0/<strong>5</strong> (0 votes cast) VA:F [1.6.6_911] <a></a> <a></a> Rating: <strong>0</strong> (from 0 votes) <a></a> </blockquote> Mis Tigi #Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ? well, i guess you’re having some good points but also missing some:

# Use h1, h2, h3, bold and italic around keywords as much as possible.
forget about bold and italic tags please!!!
we’re in a semantic area of the web. perhaps you meant em ?

# Don’t overuse Ajax. Since Ajax content is dynamic, some of the page’s content will not be seen by the spider.

not true at all. if you use remote request in a non obstructive way,
your website will be crawled very well.
an other thing though, is that google spider (don’t know for other search engine though) seems to interpret javascript and seems to be rather happy with it.
do not mis-use javascript will be a closer to what you want to say.

# Don’t use Flash for menus. The spider doesn’t look at Flash.
wrong for non dynamic contents but indeed who will want to have its static menu within a swf with all the pain in the butt it includes when most of the time you can do some pretty neat things with javascript instead.

# Use keywords in the anchor text also.
Are anchors indexed?

Mis Tigi :

yahoo seems to use it still. i have to say that yahoo spiders seems to way much more effective than the google one in many places.
where google does emphasize the domain and url name, it does give you some rather dummy result. yahoo does take this too into account but seems to correlate with other factors .

Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ?
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html
VA:F [1.6.6_911]

please wait…

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

VA:F [1.6.6_911]

Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Mis Tigi
#Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ?

]]> By: Ahmad Barirani http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-29 Ahmad Barirani Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:54:50 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-29 The title is actually the most important place to have keywords present. The title is actually the most important place to have keywords present.

]]> By: Mis Tigi http://singulartechnologies.com/8-seo-reflexes-for-web-developpers/comment-page-1#comment-28 Mis Tigi Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:53:30 +0000 http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=346#comment-28 Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ? http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html Google said is does not use meta keywords for rankings, are you saying that having them in the page title is the way to go ?

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html

]]>