<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Singular Technologies &#187; Monopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singulartechnologies.com/tag/monopoly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singulartechnologies.com</link>
	<description>The Simple Solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft-Yahoo Deal Good for Search Engine Market (and Bad for Google Monopoly)</title>
		<link>http://singulartechnologies.com/microsoft-yahoo-deal-good-for-search-engine-market-and-bad-for-google-monopoly#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://singulartechnologies.com/microsoft-yahoo-deal-good-for-search-engine-market-and-bad-for-google-monopoly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad Barirani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singulartechnologies.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the association of American marketers, the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is good for the search engine market. Even my deep disdain for Microsoft cannot stop me from agreeing with this statement! That is because of my deep disdain for any monopoly (which includes Microsoft&#8217;s monopoly of the desktop OS market). I believe that Google is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the association of American marketers, the <strong>Microsoft-Yahoo deal</strong> is <a title="Advertisers would like to see the Microsoft-Yahoo deal happen" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10377978-265.html">good for the search engine market</a>. Even my deep disdain for Microsoft cannot stop me from agreeing with this statement! That is because of my deep <a title="I always try to show how monopolies harm industries" href="http://singulartechnologies.com/tag/monopoly#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">disdain for any monopoly</a> (which includes Microsoft&#8217;s <strong>monopoly</strong> of the desktop OS market). I believe that <strong>Google</strong> is <a title="Google will soon own the Internet" href="http://singulartechnologies.com/at-the-speed-google-is-building-new-applications-our-job-will-be-to-build-web-pages-for-google-for-free#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">conquering the Internet market at a dangerous speed</a>. If no one stands on its way and does not represent a challenge to its domination, it will be bad news for the search engine market.</p>
<p>For all those who suffer from Microsoft&#8217;s careless attitude towards its customers, expect the same from Google if it becomes a monopoly. For all those who are angered by the slow pace of innovation in the desktop OS industry, the same thing will happen to the search engine market if Google owns 90% of the market. This is not the case because Google (or Microsoft) people are evil. It is only because it is in the nature of monopolies: they do not have any incentive to innovate and they can resort to  price discrimination for better profit rates.</p>
<p>So when I read something like the open letter from American advertisers, I must be in favor of the arguments that it supports, because it makes a lot of sense if we think of it from a technology strategist point of view. Competition will force both players to offer better products and prices to their customers. So why be against it? Of course, we can go on and fantasize about a future where Google will own 100% of search engine market but that it would not stop it&#8217;s pace of innovation and that it would not start asking for money in exchange of search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://singulartechnologies.com/microsoft-yahoo-deal-good-for-search-engine-market-and-bad-for-google-monopoly/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- www.000webhost.com Analytics Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php"></script>
<noscript><a href="http://www.hosting24.com/"><img src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php" alt="web hosting" /></a></noscript>
<!-- End Of Analytics Code -->
